Andy Revkin has a good writeup on the interview between Sarah Palin and Katie Couric. In the interview, Sarah Palin makes many fuzzy points which Andy Revkin (as I) request clarification: what does ‘pollution’ mean? How do we solve a problem if we don’t care what the causes are?
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- June 2012
- August 2011
- November 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
Recent Comments
John Baez on Retirement Bob Armstrong on Retirement Martin Lewitt on Judith Curry on ‘dogma… Ross on Physics of the Greenhouse Effe… John Brookes on Judith Curry on ‘dogma… Categories
Blogroll
- Arthur Smith
- Atmoz
- Climate Change
- ClimateSight
- Cronen: Physics is Phun
- Dot Earth
- Fermi Paradox
- Global Warming Art
- Global Warming Student Guide
- Gritsmill: GW Skeptic’s guide
- Grumbine Science
- History/Discovery of Global Warming
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
- James’ Empty Blog
- Judith Curry
- Logical Science
- Michael Tobis
- NERC UK
- Pew Climate
- Rabett Run
- RealClimate
- Roger Pielke Jr.
- Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group News
- Stoat
- Tamino’s blog
Pages
Meta
Climate Change 