Comments on: The latest fad to keep the denial crowd busy for a week

By: boucenna mohamed lazhar

boucenna mohamed lazhar — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:23:54 +0000

i like create big organisation of all the lovers of the earth (the warriors of the earth)

By: Bob S

Bob S — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:01:51 +0000

Maybe this screwed up his calculations: “σ…=5.670410^-8″

Yeah, that’s all it was…

By: Mauvais

Mauvais — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:15:36 +0000

You didn’t understand anything

By: Discuss Global Warming

Discuss Global Warming — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:02:12 +0000

When you have 4 BILLION YEARS worth of data to evaluate and to work with, then come crying about global warming. Until then, the SPEC of population that you all have for your data is worthless.

By: dan satterfield

dan satterfield — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:58:00 +0000

Having worked in TV for 30 years I have a collection of these type “papers” My all time favourite was a mathematical proof that thunderstorms talked to each other with thunder. (Apparently we humans cannot translate it). This one’s the best I have seen in quite some time. Thanks for a decent chuckle!

By: Hank Roberts

Hank Roberts — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:09:14 +0000

Ya know, when you look at the blog link behind the name, why bother answering these guys? All they want is attention, not information.

Response– It never ends. Probably for the potentially confused third-party readership, but if I figure it out, I’ll gt back to you– chris

By: Henry Galt

Henry Galt — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:49:12 +0000

So why is it getting colder?

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/ALLDATASETSPPI.jpg

Response– Trying to determine a climate trend from 5 years of data is pointless. Try looking at the overall trend over the last century.– chris