<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: just a few more molecules&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chriscolose.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/just-a-few-more-molecules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chriscolose.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/just-a-few-more-molecules/</link>
	<description>An Analysis of Key Questions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:04:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig Goodrich</title>
		<link>http://chriscolose.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/just-a-few-more-molecules/#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Goodrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscolose.wordpress.com/?p=70#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>One graph that you should have included here is the CO2 notch at 200 ppm, which is only slightly above the minimum necessary to sustain plant life (180ppm), and at 280 ppm, the pre-industrial level.

Another graph that should be included is the actual energy spectrum reradiated from the earth; the relative amounts of energy in the H2O spectrum and the CO2 spectrum are important to be able to judge the reasonableness of the hypothesis.  

I note that the difference in area between 380 ppm and 1000 ppm is minuscule, which suggests that effective saturation has occurred at a far lower level, which is why a 200 ppm curve would be of great interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One graph that you should have included here is the CO2 notch at 200 ppm, which is only slightly above the minimum necessary to sustain plant life (180ppm), and at 280 ppm, the pre-industrial level.</p>
<p>Another graph that should be included is the actual energy spectrum reradiated from the earth; the relative amounts of energy in the H2O spectrum and the CO2 spectrum are important to be able to judge the reasonableness of the hypothesis.  </p>
<p>I note that the difference in area between 380 ppm and 1000 ppm is minuscule, which suggests that effective saturation has occurred at a far lower level, which is why a 200 ppm curve would be of great interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg Morgan</title>
		<link>http://chriscolose.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/just-a-few-more-molecules/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscolose.wordpress.com/?p=70#comment-540</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

Excellent graphs!

Just for giggles, I&#039;d like to see that graph with water vapor only included at realistic levels, no CO2.  Doesn&#039;t water vapor alone also cause significant absorption in the 600 to 800 Wavenumber region?

Thanks,
Gregg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>Excellent graphs!</p>
<p>Just for giggles, I&#8217;d like to see that graph with water vapor only included at realistic levels, no CO2.  Doesn&#8217;t water vapor alone also cause significant absorption in the 600 to 800 Wavenumber region?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Gregg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Smith</title>
		<link>http://chriscolose.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/just-a-few-more-molecules/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscolose.wordpress.com/?p=70#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

  one correction: 380 ppmv is 0.038%, not 0.00038%.

Nice graphs though!

   Arthur


&lt;strong&gt;Silly me, thanks&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>  one correction: 380 ppmv is 0.038%, not 0.00038%.</p>
<p>Nice graphs though!</p>
<p>   Arthur</p>
<p><strong>Silly me, thanks</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
